Dilnot-o-meter

Archive

2012

2011

Dilnot-o-meter (11 January)

By Simon Bottery, Director of Policy and Communications  Too close to call

"It will take a major scandal to get social care reform into the media and bring about any real political change," a senior care industry figure suggested to me this month.

An odd statement, in a way, because 2011 was full of social care scandals in the media. There was Winterbourne View, the Southern Cross debacle, and abuse in homecare highlighted by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. All of them scandals and all of them about social care. Yet still no guarantee of political change.

He was right, though, in the sense that none of these scandals were reported as crises of our social care funding system. They were seen as failures of companies, 'the market' and the CQC. Or they were reported as 'abuse' by individuals. Rarely were they put in the context of a funding system that is falling apart at the seams.

It is still early, of course, but there are some signs that this is changing. Already this month, there has been as much media discussion about the proposals of the Dilnot Commission as there was in July, when the report was launched. Quick analysis of coverage of 'Dilnot'  search results in Google news - shown in the table below - shows that while coverage did drop off after the report's launch, the recent Care and Support Alliance letter to the Prime Minister (published in The Daily Telegraph) has brought the issue back.

The problem is the quantum. 47 media mentions is better than none, but try searching Google news for 'Leveson' - the head of the current tabloid newspaper inquiry - and you will get thousands of hits. Leveson and Dilnot are both serious inquiries into serious issues affecting millions of people, but only one has had Hugh Grant give evidence to it. And only one of them is going to lead our news day after day after day.

We need to accept that social care funding is never going to reach Leveson levels of media coverage. But that may not matter. Of course the policy agenda is influenced the media, but it's not determined by it. A continued drip-drip of media coverage may just be enough to keep reform on course.

 

Figure 1: mentions of 'Dilnot' in Google news search

Dilnot graph

 

Dilnot-o-meter verdict: Too close to call.

Posted by Simon Bottery

1 Comments:

Man said...
Looking at it aetohnr way, Dilnot proposes that all elderly people pay more tax so that (a) those with a lot of money don't have to spend all or a lot of it on their care (the cap ) and (b) those with not very much money don't have to spend any or as much of it on their care. And of course those with no money still get all their care free. Anyone see that this means inevitably the middle get squeezed even more?Why should I (who rent) have to pay more tax so the well off can leave more money to their children (or increasingly, with life expectancy rising) their grandchildren?
February 28, 2012 11:02

Post a comment